• azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I wish Microsoft keeps up with its AI obsession and push as much as possible. At some point they’ll realize the reputation damage, but the longer it will take the better. Just stop the negative publicity

  • Vogi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Love Codeberg. Just wish there would also be HackerHill, BytePeak and SoftwareSummit with federation!

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I love that Codeberg exists, but there’s one thing I kinda dislike.

      I’d like to use the same forge for my private projects (hey, a couple of them may make money one day! I gotta eat too) as I do for open source stuff, but Codeberg is explicitly open source only.

      It’s a minor thing, really. Which I could get past by using another Forgejo instance, like Codefloe. But these smaller instances, how long will they be around?

      I suppose just running my own git server, with or without a forge attached to it, for private projects, is the only real solution. But then I have even more things to self-host lol

      • moonshadow@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        39 minutes ago

        I see this as a feature not bug, and tbh kinda resent those who hoard information and try to extract wealth from it. Extremely rude to the giants whose shoulders your work is built on. I’m the person who’s going to crack and redistribute your shit as soon as you publish it, nice to meet you :)

  • biofaust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I am a wanna-be coding data analyst who has decided to start directly in Codeberg, more because of anti-US than anti-AI sentiment.

    I have 2 questions for everyone more experienced than me and in general more knowledgeable of the market dynamics:

    1. How far is Forgejo/Codeberg from feature parity with Github?
    2. I don’t see any public SaaS/tools connecting to Codeberg as they are with Github. Is this by design or is it due to lack of reception? And, in your opinion, what would be a kind of service/connector that would really change things if made available for Codeberg?
    • killabeezio@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I highly doubt there will ever be parity. There will also be some differences where there can be improvements made over GitHub. Right now you only hear about individuals moving over or open source software. This is mainly because they don’t need the enterprise features that GitHub has. I am not sure if you self hosted forgejo if you would get those as well. It’s meant to be free. This is the biggest thing that would be missing. For individuals, I don’t think you’ll notice many differences.

      For your second question. It doesn’t matter. What matters is git. There are 2 main ways to access this. SSH and http. All you really need is git. There are other tools out there like gitlab. Gitlab is pretty decent too, but the workflow is a bit different. You can even self host with gitlab too. You may not see many direct integrations to gitlab either, but people have been working with it for years now. There is also bitbucket. I think forgejo has a better chance at succeeding though if it continues to do what it’s doing. Just tailor to the free and open source community. Really the only thing people need to do is create an account and set up some ssh keys. Beyond creating an account, there is no difference in how you clone a repo from GitHub and codeberg. Just copy the URL and do git clone.

      TL;DR GitHub and codeberg have different missions. It will be a similar experience and features for individuals or open source projects are close to the same on both platforms. You probably won’t notice much of a difference.

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    259
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Microsoft has gone all-in on AI to the detriment of basically every other aspect of their business. They are in deep deep shit when the bubble finally pops.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Microsoft’s business model has always been getting businesses who are even stupider than them to give them tons of money. Nothing is ever going to change that calculus.

    • jali67@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Completely gave up on the console wars thing too for AI. Such ridiculous leadership by Sadya

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Azure might keep them afloat but everything else will likely crumble and they’ll have to downsize to mostly just being a cloud provider.

    • OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      114
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      13 hours ago

      And I am so ready for the bubble to burst.

      15% of the total United States GDP is a single company. I struggle to comprehend the scale of that, but one thing is for certain; it’s going to bite us in the ass eventually.

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Stock valuation of a company is not calculated int the GDP. Only domestic revenue is. There is no company that makes trillions in revenue.

        • OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 hours ago

          True, but Nvidia’s market cap is still equal to 15 percent of 30.486 trillion. What’s worse is that it’s ALL built on speculation.

          This house of cards WILL fall.

          • wewbull@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Nvidia is less speculation that the other companies mixed up in this. They at least sell physical goods which they’ve been shipping.

            Microsoft, Google, X, Meta - Oh boy!

            • dustyData@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              They haven’t. Part of the reason the bubble is so bad is that NVIDIA has been giving credit incentives to openai and other llm companies. Essentially giving them money so they use it to buy NVIDIA chips, so they can claim higher sales numbers. But there’s no revenue. The AI bubble is 4 or 5 companies shuffling money to each other to inflate numbers so investors inject more money.

              The only ones making bank are CEOs when they take their bonuses and cash outs. The companies themselves are bleeding. OpenAI needs something like $700 billion dollars more to survive until 2030. LLMs simply don’t make any money. Any savings from ai use has been from layoffs. It will all eventually crash out when it is obvious that AI use ultimately hurts revenue, no matter how much it saves in production.

      • kinsnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        112
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        15% of the total United States GDP is a single company

        no, it is not. you struggle to comprehend it because it is not true.

        it is comparing different things. one is a valuation, the other is the value of goods and services over a year. the comparision would be with yearly revenue of a company

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The stat that’s going around at the moment is that 30% if the GDP is transactions between the “Magnificent 7”. That one is fair because it’s economic activity.

          The underlying economy is in recession with the AI frosting on top pushing it to break even levels.

          • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            That one is even more ridiculously untrue.

            Those stocks make up 30% of S&P 500, by weight.

            Not GDP.

      • Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        It’s not one company, but the top 5 companies make up 40% of South Korea’s economy, with the top 30 76.9% of their GDP. It’s scary to imagine the power they wield over the peoples lives.

    • PrinceOfSloth@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      dont worry govt bailouts with public money will come in. Socialism for the rich and capitalism for the poor.

  • azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I wish Microsoft keeps up with its AI obsession and push as much as possible. At some point they’ll realize the reputation damage, but the longer it will take the better. Just stop the negative publicity

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 hours ago

      In the end, we opted for a simple strategy, sidestepping GitHub’s aggressive vendor lock-in: leave the existing issues open and unmigrated, but start counting issues at 30000 on Codeberg so that all issue numbers remain unambiguous. Let us please consider the GitHub issues that remain open as metaphorically “copy-on-write”.

      Do you know anything about the referenced vendor lock-in?

      • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Basically all the stuff that is build by GitHub and not part of git. Like the pull request discussion boards that is not stored in the git repository. They can’t transfer that out of GitHub to another git host.

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s just that all your shit and users are there, like issue tracking in this case.

  • Vogi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Im eyeing Zig for a long time also as the core developers behind it seem to be really cool and drama free. Which, i know, is no argument for an programming language but cool non the less. Just hope the language itself is also cool to work with.

  • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’ve been enjoying zig.

    It feels like when I go to write C, but without a bunch of code churn/copy paste on getting just the right memory management interface.

    It’s not perfect, and the API churn makes it really annoying to find decent documentation. But it’s fun.

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I think the next language I’ll learn will be rust, but Odin has been recommended to me a couple times now.

        I do want to try that one out

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Same boat, but be warned that Zig and Odin are C-like, while Rust is C++ like. The different workflow needs some getting used to.

          • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Thanks.

            I always avoided c++ for its complexity and bad error messages.

            If rust is better at that then I’ll give it an honest shot.