• yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    Sundar Pichai , Google’s CEO, sat at his desk, sipping his morning coffee as he scrolled through the Google Maps feedback reports on his phone. His eyes landed on a feedback report from Paula Kampf.

    At first, Sundar chuckled at the report’s absurdity. But as he continued reading, his expression changed from amusement to concern.

    This user was actually trying to tell him something. That Google’s search results were inaccurate and misleading. That people were getting confused between the Gulf of Mexico and the Gulf of California (not to mention other gulf-related terms). Sundar realized that his team had been so focused on pushing updates and innovations that they’d forgotten about the importance of accuracy.

    He called an emergency meeting with his top executives to discuss the issue. They poured over the data, and it became clear that the problem was widespread. Google’s algorithms were prioritizing relevance over accuracy, leading to a sea of irrelevant results.

    Sundar knew he had to act fast. He decided to make a bold change: he would overhaul Google’s search engine from the ground up. The new algorithm would prioritize accuracy and relevance, using machine learning to improve its results over time.

    The team worked tirelessly to implement the changes, testing and refining their approach every step of the way. And when they finally launched the updated search engine, something amazing happened.

    People began to rave about Google’s newfound accuracy. The user who had posted that tweet was overjoyed to see “Gulf of Mexico” come up in the top results. Others praised the changes, saying it had helped them find the information they needed more easily.

    But Sundar didn’t stop there. He realized that the issue went beyond just search engines. Google’s influence extended far into various industries, from education to finance. So, he decided to take a broader approach.

    He launched Google.org, a new initiative dedicated to promoting digital literacy and accuracy across all aspects of online life. The program provided resources and training for schools, non-profits, and individuals, helping them navigate the complexities of online information.

    The impact was staggering. Digital literacy rates skyrocketed, and people began to critically evaluate online sources with ease. Google’s search engine became just one piece of a larger puzzle, working in tandem with other platforms and initiatives to promote accuracy and understanding.

    As Sundar looked out over the city, he felt a sense of pride and accomplishment. He had taken a seemingly trivial tweet and turned it into something much bigger than himself. The future was bright, and Google was leading the way, and it all started with that one Feedback report from Paula Kampf.

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    “Resist” LMAO these people can’t run into each other without going ballistic, let alone run a grocery errand, and these are the revolutionaries that will rise against the regime

    Hahaha oh my sides

    The stunlock is real and ongoing

  • girlthing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    May I be so bold as to suggest an alternative?
    !degoogle@lemmy.ml

    You’re gonna have to do it eventually. Take advantage of the outrage you’re feeling and get it done now. Won’t take long for Google to become a direct government surveillance tool.

    They are too big to care about user feedback at this point.

  • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    You can also give the “Gulf of America” a rating on Google maps. I gave it one star and left the comment “it used to be 5 star but new management ruined it.”

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    or you can just not fucking Google things it’s not like they’ve been providing anything but ads for the past decade.

  • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I don’t really understand why Google would care, tho.

    It’s not like they are bound by a public vote or something, and you show them that you still use their Product .__.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      As a way of managing disputed borders and names in other parts of the world, Google will present the official borders in the country that they are in and show the dispute in other countries. This keeps Google in good graces in all countries they operate in.

      The US Federal Government has officially changed the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, so Google is implementing the same policy here.

      • spirinolas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        But outside the US we’re still shown the propaganda name inside parenthesis. There’s no dispute here. There’s only one real name.

      • Seigest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Cool. I don’t sympathise at all. They could stand but they choose to bend a knee to tyrants. It’s no inconvenience to me to use alternatives to their products, as I’m sure it’s no inconvenience to them that I do so. It’s a peaceful solution all round.

          • Seigest@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            58 minutes ago

            I’d use the open source ones but I haven’t found one that handles transit schedules in my area yet. I’d be open to suggestions on that.

        • vodka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Why should Google be the one who decides what is true?

          I’m not saying a government necessarily is better (though I would think it is in most cases) but is it better to trust a private for profit company over a government?

  • samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I know it won’t matter, but I sent a report about it anyway. I said that the name was changed by a fascist government for white nationalist reasons and therefore the new name is illegitimate.

  • systemglitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    All that will do is waste your time. Find something less petty that will make a difference,because this ain’t it.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Eh, I bet those reports go straight to the same /dev/null that receives youtube reports from real people. I guess all we can realistically do is spam gemini with long prompts in order to cost them extra money.

  • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Also, Trump Tower is a pretty boring name. Mexico Tower is pretty spicy. There are two Trump Towers, double the fun.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The reason they do dumb shit like this is to distract from the evil shit they’re doing.

    The crazy part is it clearly still works from what people are commenting

    • Red_October@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Believe it or not, a lot of us are able to be mad about more than one thing at a time. This one just happens to be both exceptionally stupid, exceptionally visible, and easy to resist without having to advocate for violence.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Believe it or not, a lot of us are able to be mad about more than one thing at a time.

        You can, I can, lots of people can.

        But not everyone, and certainly not the media. They only have so much airtime, it’s a zero sum game. And so is attention on a personal level.

        What you’re doing is like being in a room and saying “none of us are stupid enough to vote trump. No one is that stupid”.

        While ignoring that obviously lots of people were dumb enough to vote for him.

        You (and lots of others) desperately need to realize that people think differently than you do. Because not realizing that hasn’t been working out well for us as a society