Sundar Pichai , Google’s CEO, sat at his desk, sipping his morning coffee as he scrolled through the Google Maps feedback reports on his phone. His eyes landed on a feedback report from Paula Kampf.
At first, Sundar chuckled at the report’s absurdity. But as he continued reading, his expression changed from amusement to concern.
This user was actually trying to tell him something. That Google’s search results were inaccurate and misleading. That people were getting confused between the Gulf of Mexico and the Gulf of California (not to mention other gulf-related terms). Sundar realized that his team had been so focused on pushing updates and innovations that they’d forgotten about the importance of accuracy.
He called an emergency meeting with his top executives to discuss the issue. They poured over the data, and it became clear that the problem was widespread. Google’s algorithms were prioritizing relevance over accuracy, leading to a sea of irrelevant results.
Sundar knew he had to act fast. He decided to make a bold change: he would overhaul Google’s search engine from the ground up. The new algorithm would prioritize accuracy and relevance, using machine learning to improve its results over time.
The team worked tirelessly to implement the changes, testing and refining their approach every step of the way. And when they finally launched the updated search engine, something amazing happened.
People began to rave about Google’s newfound accuracy. The user who had posted that tweet was overjoyed to see “Gulf of Mexico” come up in the top results. Others praised the changes, saying it had helped them find the information they needed more easily.
But Sundar didn’t stop there. He realized that the issue went beyond just search engines. Google’s influence extended far into various industries, from education to finance. So, he decided to take a broader approach.
He launched Google.org, a new initiative dedicated to promoting digital literacy and accuracy across all aspects of online life. The program provided resources and training for schools, non-profits, and individuals, helping them navigate the complexities of online information.
The impact was staggering. Digital literacy rates skyrocketed, and people began to critically evaluate online sources with ease. Google’s search engine became just one piece of a larger puzzle, working in tandem with other platforms and initiatives to promote accuracy and understanding.
As Sundar looked out over the city, he felt a sense of pride and accomplishment. He had taken a seemingly trivial tweet and turned it into something much bigger than himself. The future was bright, and Google was leading the way, and it all started with that one Feedback report from Paula Kampf.
“Resist” LMAO these people can’t run into each other without going ballistic, let alone run a grocery errand, and these are the revolutionaries that will rise against the regime
Hahaha oh my sides
The stunlock is real and ongoing
May I be so bold as to suggest an alternative?
!degoogle@lemmy.mlYou’re gonna have to do it eventually. Take advantage of the outrage you’re feeling and get it done now. Won’t take long for Google to become a direct government surveillance tool.
They are too big to care about user feedback at this point.
“Resistance”
This will do nothing.
Yeah some intern is going to spend 3 minutes deleting all reports for the Gulf of Cuba
Then an engineer will automize it
You can also give the “Gulf of America” a rating on Google maps. I gave it one star and left the comment “it used to be 5 star but new management ruined it.”
or you can just not fucking Google things it’s not like they’ve been providing anything but ads for the past decade.
Hahaha, the feedback button goes directly to the trash.
resistance is taking up arms, not shouting into a void
I don’t really understand why Google would care, tho.
It’s not like they are bound by a public vote or something, and you show them that you still use their Product .__.
As a way of managing disputed borders and names in other parts of the world, Google will present the official borders in the country that they are in and show the dispute in other countries. This keeps Google in good graces in all countries they operate in.
The US Federal Government has officially changed the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, so Google is implementing the same policy here.
But outside the US we’re still shown the propaganda name inside parenthesis. There’s no dispute here. There’s only one real name.
Cool. I don’t sympathise at all. They could stand but they choose to bend a knee to tyrants. It’s no inconvenience to me to use alternatives to their products, as I’m sure it’s no inconvenience to them that I do so. It’s a peaceful solution all round.
You are asking a private company to decide national borders and names.
Boy are you insane
I’d use the open source ones but I haven’t found one that handles transit schedules in my area yet. I’d be open to suggestions on that.
Why should Google be the one who decides what is true?
I’m not saying a government necessarily is better (though I would think it is in most cases) but is it better to trust a private for profit company over a government?
10 points for MapQuest!
I know it won’t matter, but I sent a report about it anyway. I said that the name was changed by a fascist government for white nationalist reasons and therefore the new name is illegitimate.
I’ll do that while I wait for my freedom fries.
All that will do is waste your time. Find something less petty that will make a difference,because this ain’t it.
Getting off of Google as much as possible is the way to go.
Eh, I bet those reports go straight to the same
/dev/null
that receives youtube reports from real people. I guess all we can realistically do is spam gemini with long prompts in order to cost them extra money.
Also, Trump Tower is a pretty boring name. Mexico Tower is pretty spicy. There are two Trump Towers, double the fun.
The reason they do dumb shit like this is to distract from the evil shit they’re doing.
The crazy part is it clearly still works from what people are commenting
Believe it or not, a lot of us are able to be mad about more than one thing at a time. This one just happens to be both exceptionally stupid, exceptionally visible, and easy to resist without having to advocate for violence.
Believe it or not, a lot of us are able to be mad about more than one thing at a time.
You can, I can, lots of people can.
But not everyone, and certainly not the media. They only have so much airtime, it’s a zero sum game. And so is attention on a personal level.
What you’re doing is like being in a room and saying “none of us are stupid enough to vote trump. No one is that stupid”.
While ignoring that obviously lots of people were dumb enough to vote for him.
You (and lots of others) desperately need to realize that people think differently than you do. Because not realizing that hasn’t been working out well for us as a society