• Frypant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I suspect the average smart home is not based on home assistant, but on an ikea hub with their app, or similar.

    If you are willing to selfhost a home assistant, then it is not a barrier to add various antennas to it.

    So this step to standardization might help mixing different manufacturer products easier. We will see how standard their implementations will be. We had zigbee as shared standard in theory what only worked properly with the manufacturers hub.

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      For sure. IKEA is a great place to start (or stay), as it’s a cheap ecosystem and their app/implementation doesnt require permanent internet access - functions fine during an internet outrage, and quite privacy-respecting.

      HomeAssistant is not anywhere near as hard to set up as it used to be. If you have an old mini-PC retired from work sitting around there are HA images for PCs now, and it’s pretty simple to set up to use your IKEA hub (or whatever you have already), while adding a huge swath of optional features.

      I agree it’s still not something your average Joe will set up, but the continual lowering of barriers will get more people into running a self-hosted local config is a great thing for privacy and expanding the hobby.

    • dass93@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Most smart homers i have assisted run a ikea hub or similar like Hue and really just want it to be plug and play, after that they find out what happens when the network shut down and can’t access their home. Then they reach out to support people that can install Lan assist.