• Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Im really surprised Microsoft hasn’t already come out with a chrome-os like neutered version of windows specifically for this.

    • phaedrus@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Seems to me like there will be a split. A lot of critical thinkers that are frugal will move to Linux and up its market-share, but there will also be a lot of deals that companies make with cloud computing platforms as well for their employees instead of purchasing new laptops (which will probably also allow them to cut back on their IT staff).

      Those that are still lost when it comes to tech from 20 years ago will also buy into cloud compute platforms just because they use it at work and can’t be arsed to learn something slightly different.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah, this could spell the end for local installs of Microsoft office. Gdocs and o365 for everyone. Not sure if thats a win or loss.

        • phaedrus@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I see it wholly as a loss, because it advances the idea of subscriptions for anything and everything, and Microsoft will be right there on the front lines taking advantage of the new revenue stream (so losing local installs won’t hurt them at all and is what they’re going for).

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I wonder how long it will take before people realize it’s cheaper to own your own hardware than lease compute time from a cloud provider? I’ve seen this same cycle with cloud VMs, I expect this will be no different.

        • phaedrus@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          They won’t, ever. Not the general public, at least. Most are still perfectly content and onboard with paying for 10 different streaming services for music/movies/TV. Only immediate numbers mean anything, and $5/mo is better than $10 once, simply because 10 is larger than 5. Plus, look at all this extra shit I didn’t want that is included!

        • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          With cloud computing you get someone (or at least some entity) to blame when things go wrong which apparently has some value too. Also, if you don’t need a lot of resources cloud can be cheaper than setting up whole infrastructure by yourself, but that has a ton of variables. Plus with cloud there’s often option for colocation/high availability/ddos protection and other stuff around which can be pretty expensive to build yourself.

          Obviously if you try to shoehorn your current modrate sized esx/hyper-v/whatever environment to the cloud as is, that’s going to be expensive.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Obviously if you try to shoehorn your current modrate sized esx/hyper-v/whatever environment to the cloud as is, that’s going to be expensive.

            Yeah, my experience has been in the MSP space for small to medium companies. We’ve had tons of customers forego upgrading local hardware to go to a cloud provider, then have to do it in reverse a few years later when they realize they’ve already paid out the cost of their hardware and licensing agreement in hosting costs, and still have to keep paying to run the same systems.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Windows 11 can run on 4GB. That’s the minimum for the listed requirements, and the other day, I saw Best Buy selling a 4GB model, and I see some systems for sale online. I would imagine that it’s not ideal.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Even on an 8gb or 16gb system Windows uses over 4gb on a fresh boot. At 4gb it’s going to be swapping to fish non-stop. The disk will be thrashed and be dead in a year of use.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Windows 11 can run on 4GB

        That ‘can’ does a hell of a lot of heavy lifting. But then again, it says Windows can run in 4GB, it doesn’t say anything about your apps.

      • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        If I recall that 4GB min on win11 is explictedly with no applications. Including browsers.

        It’s only the os.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Windows 11 for me boots using around 7GB. Open a heavy browser tab or two and you’re page thrashing next. I can’t use a computer like that.