• brsrklf@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    7 days ago

    We need other ways to discover shit on the internet.

    I don’t know, maybe bring back the fucking webrings or something.

  • BoycottPro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    6 days ago

    But Google’s guidance was also telling us that recovery was possible if we just “removed” our “unhelpful” on-page content:

    This is very chilling because it means websites will delete content. If the internet archive didn’t grab it in time it means knowledge is gone forever. An algorithm is not going to always be accurate in determining what is helpful.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    As one Google executive recently explained: “Organizing information is clearly a trillion-dollar opportunity, but a trillion dollars is not cool anymore. What’s cool is a quadrillion dollars.”

    Any exec saying remarks like this should be old yellered.

    I’m saying this being fully aware of what I just said, and I say it because of what it implies.

    It requires massive poverty, massive control, massive casualties, people dying from whatever comes with that level of poverty, just so that a few assholes can brag about a quadrillion dollars.

    Fuck

    That

    Shit

    We need to start hard capping maximum sizes in companies. No company can employ more than 1000 people. No company can have a net worth of over one billion dollar. When a company goes over the met worth, handle it with taxes. When it reaches the employee max, that’s it, can’t hire no more.

    We also need to hard cap personal wealth. Both income and net worth must be taxed in brackets. Nobody should be allowed to own more than 10 million (or whatever is a sane max maybe less, maybe a little bit more)

    The lowest of the low pay no taxes, they have no money to do so. Then the next starts with 5, 10, etc. middle class should pay around 30 like in most countries. After that it goes up and up until you reach 100% for income, and whatever % is required to put the person’s net worth back into that 10 million limit.

    With this we don’t have a single quadrillion dollar company with a king that will soon enough fail, we’ll have thousands of multi million companies, thousands of owners of which some might fail, others won’t. Tax income will be so much that we can quite easily fund a giant social support system, free healthcare (physical and mental, eyes and teeth), free education, universal income to ensure everyone can live nicely

    NOBODY has the right to be a billionaire, it is not a right, it is not a privilege, it should be forbidden and the very fact that it’s not is a cancer on humanity.

    This “quadrillion” asshole is a clear and present danger to humanity, it’s the seed of a cancer that will destroy us all.

    • demonsword@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      None of your proposals would work for long, they only touch symptons of the real problem. We should be dismantling capitalism. It’s the system itselft that allows the massive unequality we see around us, and it’s by design.

    • dumbpotato@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Any exec saying remarks like this should be old yellered.

      And their children if they grow up to be the same or worse.

  • Routhinator@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is why I shut The Den of Amateur Writing down after 25 years of running and developing it. I had written the entire codebase for Googles SEO, rolled out the update so my users would see a bit more traffic trickle in, and then watched them delist all my URLs 3 months later when this change rolled out. I just gave up. It was taking way too much of my life fighting googles bullshit to provide a free community.

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’d not heard of your site before, but it sounds like it was a cool thing while it lasted. That seems to be the trend of the day. The cool things are giving way to very dumb things.

      • Routhinator@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        It really was a great thing. It happened naturally too. Started as just a site I posted my writing to, a personal site in 1997, and friends wanted to add their stuff. By 1999 it was renamed from Routhy’s Den to the Den of Amateur Poetry, and then the domain was purchased and the site renamed to The Den of Amateur Writing.

        I still remember the pre-PHP days. People would email their works to me and I would manually build an HTML page and update the site within 24 hours.

      • Routhinator@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yep, I fought against it for years but eventually my new user intake was lower than the rate at which the typical user would fizzle out and move on. We had users that were there for 20 years and regulars, but without fresh ideas and posts things would get stale. So I had to yield and start adhering. Around 2018-2019 things really took a dive in traffic and I could not afford ads as it was all completely out of pocket, so I started a new codebase and rewrote it over 4 years in my spare time. The site before it shut down had a top grade from all of Googles site scanners and I had thought “Perfect… now folks will trickle in again at the right rate.”. And then the delisting.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Google’s methods are shitty and exploitative, yes, but this is far from “censoring”. And “censor” is not used just for a clickbait title - the author claims “censorship” multiple times in the article before I stopped reading for health reasons (the doctor says if I keep rolling my eyes, my ocular muscles will spasm and eject my eyeballs).

    Really wish people would stop wielding powerful words irresponsibly.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not saying you’re wrong but people use words that are useful in conveying to their target audience. Denylisting by the search monopolist is perceived as censorship by many.

      Bombast aside, I think the process and its implications are interesting and people need to be aware.

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Agreed. It makes some solid points, and it seems well-researched in the way of exposing how the search-result hotdogs are made (at least in the 2/3 or so that I read). I just couldn’t stomach the way it was framed as “censorship”.

        I’m very passionate about “words have meanings” and strongly dislike when words typically reserved to describe mountains are inappropriately used (and watered down) to describe mole hills.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Would you prefer “suppress”?

      Also, wouldn’t your eyes bounce right back since they’re attached with a sort of rubber band?

      • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        No, because nothing is being actively suppressed, either. The gist of it is that they’re basically being ignored which is completely separate from active measures like censorship or suppression.

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    JFC if there a uBlock list I can add to block most AI crap or do I have to get a new addon for that?

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    They’ve been doing shit like that* without AI for decades. But yeas, it’s getting worse all the time.

    * censor | suppress - tomatos | tomatoes

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Perhaps this is how they’re trying to solve the factuality problem of their LLM? Limit the sources to a known good allowlist. Train the AI answers model on those. If that’s what’s happening, it would be ironic that they’d have to undo their search results enshittification in order to overcome the LLM’s inherent flaws. Of course the regular search results could keep being shitty. In fact they might get worse depending on the cost of the AI Mode.