

Just like Andrew Garfield was obviously NOT in that Spider-man movie.
Just like Andrew Garfield was obviously NOT in that Spider-man movie.
Honestly it looks too overcrowded. In exactly all the worst ways to start a universe.
But we’ll see.
IMO it does not drive the story at all. The bugs plot was going to happen anyway, which is the culminating story, and the cloning thing becomes just a gimmick to make some jokes. I expected it to be a much more integral part.
I did not like Mickey 17 much, to be honest. It’s supposed to be a comedy, but it’s so dry… They try to make you care at some point, and it doesn’t work. Also, the cloning sci-fi part is also irrelevant for the final plot.
Haven’t watched Novocaine, but by the looks of the trailer, I can tell you there’s a lot more of fun action sequences than Mickey 17, if you are into that.
It’s the last bit, she was originally more important and ended up as an extra in the edition process.
TLDR: she was in IronMan 3 but they did not credit her and she didn’t like that at all.
Fix: they did credit her, but not as the original, important character she was supposed to be. Her scenes were mostly cut and she ended up as a very minor “extra”.
Arch Linux?
To be honest, I didn’t find it very good. I don’t know about the books, but the movie makes it seem like there’s something interesting about the expendables, and ends up being about something completely different, much more boring and overdone. Characters are also basically useless.
Aren’t most movies a microcosm of a story packed into a couple of hours?