You know what they say: (☞ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)☞Fight executive’s bullshit with executive’s bullshit.
You know what they say: (☞ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)☞Fight executive’s bullshit with executive’s bullshit.
Personally I would happily let my AI bot attend the stupid scrum meetings for me. Let it tell my scrum master and stakeholders whatever the progress of my day of work and in the sprint. Don’t bother me in my coding time.
Or, you know, run it in a chroot.
Look at his fingers. Fucking AI content too.
Me too. I presume half of the votes on this comment are upvotes because they only read the first half of it.
Can you please explain how you come to such a conclusion of your second half, OP? Like you saw, we really don’t follow.
shitty shit
Bloat! Somebody call the police!
Commit1: actual change
Commit2: this code is so misleading and I have to refactor it refactors
Me: painfully rejects PR the story said nothing about refactoring…
“I plan to celebrate my son’s birthday next month. Do you think it helps if I marry eight more wives?”
It could, but not necessarily.
char **args
can just mean you have a pointer which points to an address, and at that address, you can get a second address. Follow the second address, there is a char
saved there.
On the other hand, char *args[]
means " follow this address to find a list of characters".
Tried multiple attempts to make myself understand CMake with no success. With GNU Make it just explains itself.