real men don’t have trauma and women don’t exist. case dismissed.

it will always be and has always been about money

lAIbility instead of liability

Oh wow this is truly disgusting. It’s rare to find a feature that is so badly designed that it disgusts you. Annoyed or frustrated? Sure. Enraged even. But I feel like I want to throw up after watching 20 seconds of this video.

And big tech selling their analyses to health insurance crooks for outrageous amounts of money so that the crooks can optimise their profits by asking for higher prices for health issues that occur more frequently (and integrate the cost of these analyses into the insurance pricing as well lol). All of this can still be done without violating privacy and anonymity but still fuck people over majorly.

One of the target’s two children died in the pager attacks. Civilian casualties & injuries are not always human shields. In the case of pager attacks for instance none actually was since the attack was unexpected.

First NHS then this? We might as well just let big tech take over the whole country.

go on, do it. do it so we get rid of this addiction

I hope by AI they don’t mean LLMs because that is not the correct architecture for this job but definitely what every crook would go for to get funds.

That gives me a good idea. A week before the protest buy burners, use them frequently near republican supporters’ house, go to a protest, use your phone all the time in the protest, dump them near the police, let them enjoy the fruits of the regime they supported.

and cover your face if you are in a shithole country like USA, Turkey, Russia etc

Are they looking for handmaids?

well so much hype has been generated around chatgpt being close to AGI that now it makes sense to ask questions like “can chatgpt prove the Riemann hypothesis”

HOW DARE YOU ASK FOR COMFORT IN YOUR ONLY ONE LIFE???!!

I thought it was the state from the headline too. maybe because of German’s state past behaviour on the topic and high likelihood of it doing such a thing sort of naturally completed the narrative in my head

yea I also couldnt get the formatting to work right, triple quotes kept turning things into accented letters, so I gave up.

and also := also known as the walrus operator is very fun and sometimes very convenient to use

wait till you see

if __name__ = "__main__":

   main()
`

If you do it through AI you can still learn. After all I go through the code to understand what is going on. And for not so complex tasks LLMs are good at commenting the code (though it can bullshit from time to time so you have to approach it critically).

But anyways the stuff I ask LLMs are generally just one off tasks. If I need to use something more frequently, I do prefer reading stuff for more in depth understanding.

correction: will kill people’s attempts to make billions out of other people’s art. Otherwise inquisitive people will continue to do non-profit research this way or another.

Actually here is a question to you: Would you be ok if the law stated you don’t need permission if it is non-profit and open source? Yea I thought so bitch.

I am on you with this one. It is also very helpful in argument heavy libraries like plotly. If I ask a simple question like “in plotly how do I do this and that to the xaxis” etc it generally gives correct answers, saving me having to do internet research for 5-10 minutes or read documentations for functions with 1000 inputs. I even managed to get it to render a simple scene of cloud of points with some interactivity in 3js after about 30 minutes of back and forth. Not knowing much javascript, that would take me at least a couple hours. So yeah it can be useful as an assistant to someone who already knows coding (so the person can vet and debug the code).

Though if you weigh pros and cons of how LLMs are used (tons of fake internet garbage, tons of energy used, very convincing disinformation bots), I am not convinced benefits are worth the damages.