

in newpipe you don’t log into youtube. so minimal data harvesting.
in newpipe you don’t log into youtube. so minimal data harvesting.
emule: am i a joke to you?
can i get a tldr on the content and defederation part?
it’s always porn…
discord is a plague
this feels like the natural evolution of the good old forums.
but no, we all had to go to facebook etc.
as an old redditor, i don’t know, how i should feel about that big ass emoji.
to me it was clear that the us is heading into authoriatism, that’s why i thought his statement was interessting.
“so, we can’t trust you either?” kinda way.
but yeah, we better pull very hard on those bootstraps.
things like that make me think that llms still have a long way to go.
it basicly means, that things that i do, i assume a lot of people do.
for example:
people cheating, have a higher tendency to suspect their partner of cheating.
or in this case:
vance knows what they are going to do with the data.
danke merkel
He also warned European states not to partner with authoritarian states on AI development.
“Partnering with them means chaining your nation to an authoritarian master that seeks to infiltrate, dig in and seize your information infrastructure,” he said.
in german we say: was ich denk und tu, trau ich andern zu.
which translats to something like: what I think and do, I trust others to do
“So I say bring him back,” Vance continued. “If he’s a bad dude or a terrible member of the team, fire him for that.”
guy maried to indian woman, having half indian kid wants anti-indian nazi to come back.
can’t make this shit up…
your concept of free speach is just bullshit, that’s all
Meta’s Llama models also impose licensing restrictions on its users. For example, if you have an extremely successful AI program that uses Llama code, you’ll have to pay Meta to use it. That’s not open source. Period.
open source != no license restrictions
According to Meta, “Existing open source definitions for software do not encompass the complexities of today’s rapidly advancing AI models. We are committed to keep working with the industry on new definitions to serve everyone safely and responsibly within the AI community.”
i think, he’s got a point, tho
is ai open source, when the trainig data isn’t?
as i understand, right now: yes, it’s enough, that the code is open source. and i think that’s a big problem
i’m not deep into ai, so correct me if i’m wrong.
sure, but i liked that awarded comments got highlighted. and they even added another layer of funny sometimes.
and i thought they might encourage people to be more active. but yeah, my upvote proposel doesn’t seem to be very smart as @owenfromcanada@lemmy.world pointed out.
i hate emojis.
that’s a certificate, duh…
good point conserning upvotes.
in the end it should be just another entry in the database, so might be able to implement on an instance level.
“last week tonight” just published an episode on that topic