Just a corn on the internet.
Use the matrix contact @einkorn:tchncs.de for private messages (Lemmy stores DMs in plain text).
🇩🇪 DE/EN 🇬🇧
- 0 Posts
- 34 Comments
121·2 days agoYes, I know. That’s why BYD is going to
then squeezethe customers once they are locked in.
I’d argue it is.
Just look how Amazon got where it is now: Sell way under market price, till local competition closed shop, then squeeze.
No backup, no mercy.
- gets rejected at the border because officer doesn’t believe person doesn’t have social media accounts
- ???
- no profit
Waht the fuck France?
No fuck, oui?
Well, it’s always been a cat and mouse game.
Just earlier today, I got a pop-up on YouTube about how they would block me after 3 videos because I use an ad blocker. Jump to now and everything is fine again. Thank you, uBlock Origin!
For us None-Americans: Is that good or bad?
It fits perfectly as a vessel to further the neoliberal agenda of dismantling any form of regulations to create their vision of a “perfect” free market society.
A “free market” as in the sense these lunatics envision it is a market devoid of any form of outside regulations. In essence, survival of the fittest on an economical level: Profit above all else, might makes right, consequences be damned. One
presidentführerCEO calling the shots, everybody else following or getting crushed in the machinery.So you tell me: What’s not authoritarian about corporate capitalism?
Profit over everything else is part of which ideology again?
Capitalism kills
Well, it could have been but just like
robot.txteveryone ignored the Do-not-track Header in HTTP requests.
Do you genuinely think reliable medical tests are being targeted at you through ads?
Nope, but that is an entirely different problem. Major platforms have to be legislated to tightly control which ads they run. The amount of misinformation spread through ads is enormous.
Also, a depression test? Some people certainly would benefit from knowing that a) no, showing these symptoms is neither normal nor healthy, and b) there can be something done against this.
Bluesky, the decentralized social network […]
Were only one instance exist or did I miss something?
OK, I am going to try arguiung that privacy supersedes food:
To have a right to anything means there is something that I own. Owning something puts a division between me and others who can not own this specific thing: My right is my own, I do not have to diminish it by sharing. The most fundamental form of division is absence. Having a right to privacy is a right to the absence from others. Therefore the right to privacy is a more fundamental one than the right to food.
However, I agree that in practice eating in public beats dying in private any time of the day. 🤷
There is a limit to that effect, though. And most observers agree that the state is subsidizing heavily.