• 26 Posts
  • 112 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 13th, 2024

help-circle

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mltoProgrammer Humor@lemmy.mlelectron.jxl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    it was called CROSS PLATFORM APPS

    Absolutely not unless it’s as sandboxed as the web (which even the web isn’t sandboxed that well).

    Working with software has only made me not trust software (that’s not open source.)

    Why we’re giving any random software full user level access in 2026 is beyond me.





  • I would still consider buying a cheap one for $20 (cheapest price I could find from a quick search) if privacy is your priority. Having it record to an SD card with no online capabilities is intrinsically more private than any app you can get. In fact I would specifically get a cheap one because apparently even a slightly more expensive one will have app integration.

    A free alternative is an old phone you don’t use anymore, permanently in airplane mode and with just the regular camera app. Can be one where the battery doesn’t hold a charge anymore that you just have plugged into your car.

    Or your old point and shoot you probably haven’t touched since smartphones became popular. Would be a good way to make use of it again.



  • “No longer needed” is probably never going to happen, but IMO needed by fewer companies is inevitable. I see “vibe coding” as an extension to those website builders like Squarespace, definitely not suitable for a large website or a company whose entire business model is software and/or web based services, but good enough that the owner of a small, non-tech company who just happens to need a website or simple app can do it themselves instead of paying someone on Fiverr or something to do it. Unfortunately that means the options for new developers looking for easy experience building jobs that could eventually help them land a better paying position will be even more limited than it is now.



  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mltoProgrammer Humor@lemmy.mlZero Trust Architecture
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This raises an interesting issue: Should house guests expect to be given Wi-Fi access? I’ve personally never even asked for Wi-Fi when I go over to someone else’s house because frankly I don’t trust their network. I don’t know what “smart devices” are port scanning every other device or collecting MAC addresses, I don’t know if they’ve ever updated their router firmware and if it’s been infected by the numerous malware automatically scanning the internet for unpatched routers. Not worth it, I’d rather use mobile data or not access the internet until I go home. Also I don’t want Google or Cloudflare to know who my friends are and where they live by having my browser fingerprint show up on their IP.



  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mltoProgrammer Humor@lemmy.mlJunoir vs Senior
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Is Erlang special in its architecture or is it more that it’s functional?

    One day I’ll learn how to do purely functional, maybe even purely declarative. But I have to train my brain to think of computer programs like that.

    Is there a functional and/or declarative language that has memory management features similar to Rust as opposed to a garbage collector?


  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mltoProgrammer Humor@lemmy.mlJunoir vs Senior
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    but literally beating the flagship desktop chips in single-core performance

    See, this is what I despise about x86. AFAIK it’s literally RISC on the bare metal but there are hundreds of “instructions” running microcode which is basically just a translation layer. You’re not allowed to write code for the actual RISC implementation because that’s a trade secret or something. So obviously single core performance would be shit because you’re basically running an emulator all the time.

    RISC-V can’t come fast enough. Maybe someone will even make a chip that’s RISC-V but with the same instruction/microcode support as x86. So you can run RISC-V code directly or do the microcode thing and pretend you’re on x86. Though that would probably get the shit sued out of them by Intel because god forbid there’s actual innovation that the original creator can’t cash in on.