Oh hi there person who I’ve upset by expressing my opinion who is now wanting to go back through my post history to find something to use against me! If you’re reading this, it’s because you’ve already lost the argument :)

  • 2 Posts
  • 504 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: April 26th, 2025

help-circle







  • Most recently, the new DOGE has suffered substantial security lapses,

    Did they? What? The made up ones where people claimed that DOGE gave russian hackers access to databases despite DOGE never even requesting access to their systems?

    Even before Twitter was aquired, Twitter had an embarrassing memorable history with public figures suffering from security incidents caused by Twitter’s own staff, training, technology or processes.

    Funny that you say this after you said this:

    Musk routinely hires young unqualified technicians, and abused, laid off, or otherwise alienated much of the top talent at Twitter, in the name of cost savings.

    So twitters staff, training, technology and processes were the source of these embarrassing incidents…but then Musk shouldn’t have gotten rid of them?

    but could be disasterous for anyone relying on this new E2EE solution, if it is incorrectly implemented.

    And there’s nothing to say that it is incorrectly implemented other than hopes and dreams by people who want it to be.

    The talent needed to correctly implement secure end to end encryption is rare, on a good day, for a good employer with a strong history of loyalty to their staff.

    Absolutely not true lol. Secure end to end encryption is a solved problem. It’s not hard to implement.