• max_dryzen@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    it’s the anonymity that empowers people to say the absolute worst things.

    humans behave badly when they perceive they have social license to do so. anonymity has little to do with it

    • exhibit A: public robberies of German Jews in the 1930s
    • exhibit B: rwandan genocide
    • exhibit C: any public confrontation video shot during the Covid pandemic

    your second paragraph makes you sound like Larry Ellison. all you’re arguing for is the extension of the capacity of corporations to constrain and coerce invidiual behaviour, which is gross

    • SSNs4evr@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      60 minutes ago

      I think anonymity has a lot to do with it, but you certainly point out that there’s more than anonymity to factor in. I also agree that, especially in our problemed data sharing environment, having our data on public display would be troublesome (understatement of the year). My comments weren’t so much of a “we should do this,” as much as a point of the cost of fixing the problem. Fixing the problem would be worse than the problem itself, but not by much, since all of our data is collected anyway. I personally believe that social media should mostly be outlawed - but I’m old enough to remember a better world before it existed.