• jeeva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    For what it’s worth, I subscribe to the “use your TV as a screen, plug another device in to deal with content” method. It’s not connected to the network.

    So, whatever my TV wants to do, I’m not using it’s janky apps that might get slow over time or try to advertise to me - my Nvidia shield (which is on the ropes/way out due to some updates it pushed) CEC wakes the TV and plays content without having any particular insight into my emotional state. But I can replace that relatively easily/cheaply until my screen literally stops working, rather than if some new service isn’t supported on it or an old one is deprecated.

    I’m being tempted to replace the shield with a NUC or other device due to the updates I mentioned above - but I can probably replace the launcher more easily.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      You’re still rewarding bad behaviour. They still put all the crap on and made the sale anyway.

      • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        They make more money from those continued sales through their app store and commercials. I’ve heard (on reddit news articles posted to r/technology, so not exactly the most reliable source) more than the profit for the initial sale of the tv because they actually subsidize the initial price and may sell it at a loss to get those ads in your livingroom.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          To get them to stop they need to lose both the original sale and the additional advertising revenue. Right now their thinking is:

          • People are buying our TVs
          • Putting advertising on them isn’t causing our sales to drop
          • Therefore it’s costing us next to nothing to do.
          • It often gets us extra revenue if they connect to the internet.
          • If they don’t connect, we still more than covered our costs.

          There is no downside for them. Only upside. The equation needs to change for them to stop doing it.

      • keyez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Them missing out on a dozen sales because of that isn’t going to change their ways either.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          No, which is why people saying “Buy it and don’t connect it to the internet” isn’t helping. More people need to not buy it and tell other people not to buy it.

    • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I’ve been planning to do the same thing when our current batch of TVs kick the bucket. But I was going to use an appletv, not a NUC, because all of the streaming services only serve 2k through browsers but their apps can get 4k+. And for the rest I’ll run jellyfin and serve from my home media server. The TV will never see the a valid internet connected network.

      Recently my roku tv started showing a blaringly loud auto-play ad on the homepage once every 2-3 weeks. FUCK THAT.