The Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to RetroGaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 days ago...is this retro?media.piefed.worldexternal-linkmessage-square243linkfedilinkarrow-up1980arrow-down129
arrow-up1951arrow-down1external-link...is this retro?media.piefed.worldThe Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to RetroGaming@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 days agomessage-square243linkfedilink
minus-squaresaltesc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·18 days agoIt is on a timeline, but not tech. If you compare 1985 to 2005, holy shit. So many classics because of mind blowing advances. 2005 - 2025… Well, there’s still 2005 games that go hard with some mods. We really rely on gameplay and story to make a classic now.
minus-squaresamus12345@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·18 days agoYeah, once we hit 20 years since the 360’s launch, we had 20 year old games that still look pretty decent by today’s standards. I don’t think you could say that at any point in time before then.
minus-squareThe Picard Maneuver@piefed.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 days agoThis comment from yesterday stuck with me - I really like this definition of retro being on the tech progress timeline, not just “x years since”.
It is on a timeline, but not tech.
If you compare 1985 to 2005, holy shit. So many classics because of mind blowing advances.
2005 - 2025… Well, there’s still 2005 games that go hard with some mods. We really rely on gameplay and story to make a classic now.
Yeah, once we hit 20 years since the 360’s launch, we had 20 year old games that still look pretty decent by today’s standards. I don’t think you could say that at any point in time before then.
This comment from yesterday stuck with me - I really like this definition of retro being on the tech progress timeline, not just “x years since”.