• Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 hour ago

    The logic behind the voice controls sounds pretty questionable, but it’s supposedly backed by data showing that users spend billions of minutes talking in Microsoft Team meetings, according to Mehdi — so they’re already used to talking on the computer, right?

    Do they really reason like this? Oh my. That’s stupid. And here I was thinking Microsoft employs clever people.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I was thinking Microsoft employs clever people

      As a programmer, I’ve had numerous colleagues who have ended up as software engineers at MS. They were mostly either unbelievably lazy or extremely incompetent. The rest who were both ended up there as managers.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          53 minutes ago

          TBF this was all more than 5 years ago when the job interviewing process at most IT companies involved just putting a moistened finger underneath the candidate’s nostrils. Apparently the programmer job market is pretty horrific these days, although I wouldn’t know since I drive a school bus now.

    • mechoman444@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I am also newly minty fresh.

      Although up graded anyway because the games I play aren’t an Linux.

      The only downside is gaming.

      I made a portable flashdrive for Linux for anything I want to keep privet and left windows for exclusively gaming.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        Games work great in Linux!

        And that’s not like “oh, about 3/4 of my favorite old games work without too much trouble.” It’s more like opening steam and “holy crap, half of my old favorites have native Linux versions and everything else just works using proton.”

        Remember, the Steam Deck and the general shittiness of Microsoft has directed a lot of Valve’s resources towards gaming on Linux.

        If you want to play some brand new AAA multiplayer thing with rootkit type anti cheat, then maybe you’d be stuck dual booting into windows.

        I’d argue that those games could be abandoned, because there is SO much choice out there that I am certain I already own copies of dozens of games that I will never play. But if it’s a matter of playing what your friends are into, then yeah make the computer adapt to the human needs and not the other way around.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Depending on the games you play, thanks to Valve with Proton and Steam Deck, most games are actually already playable on Linux. The only exception is newer multi-player online games with kernel-level anticheat. I haven’t done any gaming on Windows in years pretty much.

        • Laser@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 minutes ago

          While there is quite the push thanks to Valve, they built upon the work of others, mostly Wine (which I think they fund nowadays) and DXVK (they hired the dev after a short while). So they’re definitely not freeloading, but the main lifting has been done by Codeweavers and Wine contributors through their massive work over the years, plus the quantum leap that was DXVK.

          I’m not trying to shame Valve here, they definitely go beyond what they’d be required to by license, but I feel it’s also not fair to call them the reason most games work under Linux when others have poured literal years of work into making it possible.

      • NutWrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Steam has a native Linux client and every game I bought on Windows runs just fine on Linux.

        All my older, non-steam games, like “Deus Ex” or “Giants: Citizen Kabuto” run great under Wine, using the default settings. Also, there are Linux versions of DOSBox, for older games.

      • BilSabab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        basically my current setup too. it took me just a couple of months on Win11 to straight up give up on Windows because it’s just not very good

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    For now, the Copilot features will be technically opt-in, but it’s more than possible that this will change in the future.

    As much as i dislike some Windows 11 elements, let’s stick to facts. The headline make it seem way worse than it actually is, although still not good at all.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      32 minutes ago

      This is how Microsoft has rolled out everything for decades.

      • opt in
      • opt out when prompted
      • turn off from control panel
      • turn off from registry
      • turn off from two places in registry
      • turn off with 3rd party app
      • “you’re being weird, everyone uses that”
  • pachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Not sure why we’re surprised. And even then, it took a while for the “good” OSes to get good. Windows 7 is remembered fondly because it ended well, not because it started well.

    Windows 95: OK Windows 98: Bad Windows 98 SE: OK Windows ME/2000: Bad Windows XP: OK Windows Vista: Bad Windows 7: OK Windows 8: Bad Windows 10: OK Windows 11: Bad

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Windows 98 wasn’t bad. It was a big improvement in stability over 95. Windows ME/2000 were two completely separate products. Win 2000 was based on NT which always got better until maybe Vista. Vista itself wasn’t bad. The problem was end users not liking security. Vista made it easier than sudo to temporarily elevate security and everyone still complained. So they backed off on 7 which was less secure because it didn’t enforce security elevation as much.

      You also can’t list 98SE and ignore Win 8.1. 8.1 was a bandaid fix for the start menu of 8 but was still a bad. Not to mention that there was also Win95 OSR1 and Win95 OSR2.

      There’s no significant difference between 10 and 11 to claim one is good and the other is bad. All the spyware and advertising garbage in 11 was also in 10.

      • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        *backed off on 7 ?

        I think you’re also overlooking that the driver model changed for Vista, so tons of hardware listed as supporting Vista was just extremely unstable at release until hardware vendors figured out the new driver model

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          If its drivers, then XP was really bad. It was so bad it didn’t even support HD’s bigger than 128GB at release despite Win2k supporting the larger drives.

  • Tim_Bisley@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Forcing users to ditch WIndows 10? I can’t help but feel like this is a giant media campaign by microsoft to make people switch to Win 11. Nobody is forcing anyone to do anything. I can still use Windows XP if I want to.

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Corporate users will find it unacceptable to use an OS without regular security updates. Individual users will do whatever they want as per usual. Unfortunately without the security updates, the average Windows 10 user is going to be less and less secure over time, although MS will undoubtedly patch major things.

      • AceOnTrack@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The machine I have to use at work was updated to windows 10 two months ago. One of the software we use for our job is hosted on a VM running Windows 98.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    How bad would running Windows 10 past support be exactly? Seems like most vulnerabilities should have been patched by now.

    • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Extended security updates are available. This can be activated for free using Microsoft Activation Scripts.

      Microsoft tech support has been repeatedly caught using these scripts to resolve support tickets for license issues. (https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/microsoft-support-cracks-windows-for-customer-after-activation-fails/) Also, the open source MAS code is hosted on Microsoft-owned Github, so they are appearantly not very concerned with people taking advantage of this exploit.

      If you go this route, please also see the FAQ entry here. There is currently a glitch with commercial ESU keys (which this uses) and Windows Update will continue to claim that your device will no longer receive security updates. This is also effecting W10 LTSC systems. However, you can verify that the license key is active through Command Prompt and instructions are given in the FAQ.

    • prof@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      See an example here:

      Microsoft said both issues could allow attackers to execute code with elevated privileges, although there are currently no indications on how they are being exploited and how widespread these efforts may be. In the case of CVE-2025-24990, the company said it’s planning to remove the driver entirely, rather than issue a patch for a legacy third-party component.

      The security defect has been described as “dangerous” by Alex Vovk, CEO and co-founder of Action1, as it’s rooted within legacy code installed by default on all Windows systems, irrespective of whether the associated hardware is present or in use.

      New attack vectors are found constantly. Having no support can very likely result in a system that can be automatically breached in a few weeks to months.

      As long as you don’t have a public IP on your device and are in a trusted network you should be fine. But if you use a public wifi or somehow expose a port to the internet you’re increasingly vulnerable for each day after the last security update.

    • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There’s always going to be vulnerabilities, that’s why they’re ending support. They don’t want to spend time updating an OS they don’t want people using.

      Windows 10 is probably fairly secure… today. In 2 years, someone might discover a new vulnerability, and you won’t get the update. If there’s a new way to do web security and the browsers need OS support to implement it, you’ll be stuck on legacy security settings.

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Short term honestly likely fine for your avg person. After even six months tho I wouldn’t trust using it for banking, government sites or anything more sensitive then looking at cat memes.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If you want to keep running Win10, look into 0patch. They do in memory patching and are MUCH smaller, it’s what a real OS manufacturer would put out.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Its probably more lazy than anything. Security always depends on what you need to protect. If you want to keep using it, dont keep sensitive information on it. People will target vulnerabilities in Windows 10 as time goes on.

    • BlackPenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a conspiracy where Microsoft purposely left a massive hole in windows 10. And they are going to attack their own system in 2 months and be like “oh noez, welp guess you have to come to windows 11”.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        They don’t care about forcing you to 11 other than it saves them development costs. All the ads and spyware are also in 10.

        It’s the same reason Linux distro’s don’t patch old kernels but force you to upgrade every 12 years.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s insane how much extra time, effort and sanity you can retain simply by switching to Linux. I initially switched a few years ago, then fully shortly after. Using my PCs has never been better and I had no issues with gaming. The only games that don’t work are some of the live service ones I’ll never be interested in.

    One of the best decisions in my life, right up there with deleting all social media. Life keeps getting better, relatively speaking, but of course rich pedophiles just can’t tolerate us having a good time.

  • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    These threads feel kinda redundant, all comments are just preaching to the choir.

    Can anyone comment about anything besides “[…] switched to Linux […]”?

    • sonofearth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What else do you expect everyone to do? Please enlighten us if you have something more to offer than switching to Linux — which seemingly is the best option currently.

      • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’m not saying that you shouldn’t, I am saying that there’s more to discuss than “switched to Linux /thread”.

        For example let me just quote microsoft “The vision that we have is: let’s rewrite the entire operating system around AI, and build essentially what becomes truly the AI PC.” and think about what that means for your workplace. Windows isn’t going to vanish in a few years. The companies that have a lot of windows PCs will have to deal with increased hardware requirements in an already expensive market, have to wrangle user settings that the ai set on voice commands or fight against Microsoft to shut it all down.

        I feel like there’s going to be a lot of wasted productivity in the coming years spend on fixing what ai broke.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      windows 10 LTSC from massgrave.dev site for afew years, but that will come to an end too. after that if you hate yourself there are the BSDs, or you can install hackintosh too. but the linuxes are the most mature alternative that won’t just fuck you over

    • melfie@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      There are several common refrains on Lemmy that many people find cathartic. If you don’t care to tell us about your preferred Linux distro again, maybe another thread will pop up soon about how streaming services are enshittified and you can tell us about what you’re self-hosting again.

      • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I get wanting to tell people that you’ve switched from windows but these threads just feel too repetitive to be engaging, there’s no interesting discussion when everyone is just repeating the same points every month.

        There’s also no discussion about the article or if there is then I couldn’t find it because of all the switched to Linux comments.

        Oh well, back to other threads…

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 minutes ago

          Just downvote. Downvotes don’t mean you dislike them or think they’re wrong, it just means you think the comment should have less visibility.

      • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Companies have already updated, new notebooks come with windows 11, it’s sadly inevitable that most users will sooner or later be switched to windows 11.

  • tccpdi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Long time windows user, games retained me but I found Proton so bye bye forever windows. Now convincing my wife to switch it’s the real challenge haha

  • ‮redirtSdeR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I hate windows 11 so much. Notifications are so much harder to read compared to 10 due to the right menu being nonexistant, instead we have this floating notification area that I never use. Everything takes ages to load, even on my beefy pc Settings still takes like 10 seconds to open. And it feels like the programmers died halfway though re-coding the context menus. Everything slightly more advanced can only be done through the old stuff so you end up with this awful mess where there’s no design consistency, and it takes twice the clicks to get to something.

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Windows team is desperate to remain relevant.

    I suspect most Microsoft revenue these days comes from Azure and the cloud version of Office. Windows OS is pretty much irrelevant other than as a platform to distribute other products.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I am predicting at some point Windows itself will become a business only product and cease to be marketed to consumers, and the home user platform will be some kind of live service bullshit probably served in a browser. Basically the Chromebook idea, but Microsoft.

    • sonofearth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Once Adobe apps and new versions of Microsoft office start working reliably on Linux, 50% of corporate PCs are out of Windows’ market share.