My bet would be, convenient and intrusive. The two are not mutually exclusive—in fact, they very frequently go together.

Why do people have such trust that a national ID won’t be misused to further erode personal privacy? I have no idea why this policy is seen as at all positive.

(Any responses along the lines of “you’ve already lost your privacy” or “the government already has the data” won’t convince me. There wouldn’t be a push for a national ID if the scheme could be built out of the data the government already have)

Any government closed source app is a trojan.

Same thing with obligatory scanning fingerprints for a new ID. They say it’s only for “hash” generation.