• School_Lunch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    You gave credence to an wild claim with no available evidence or details because it came from “legitimate sources”, even though it was obvious they were trying to push a narrative. Then you turned around and demanded a higher standard when someone claimed the opposite. They’re both untrustworthy without verification, and it is a bit hypocritical to say one was legitimate while immediately doubting the other.

      • School_Lunch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well fuck me seems I really hit a nerve. I was just pointing out some passing observations. Its not like I’m screaming about some strongly held opinion. I was just giving my two cents and people are jumping all over me, and I genuinely don’t know why the strong reaction.

          • School_Lunch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            You seem very angry. I wasn’t trying to troll just point things out that I noticed and it resulted in me getting cussed out. I understand disagreements, but I was civil the whole time. I’m guessing you’re saying I’m being pedantic about op being hypocritical? Maybe. But in the end all I was trying to say was people need to reevaluate what they consider legitimate. Any news that reported trans idealogy was carved into the bullet casing without asking any further questions is absolute trash journalism.