• truthfultemporarily@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think NAT is one reason why the internet is so centralized. If everyone had a static IP you could do all sorts of decentralized cool stuff.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Right, not the only reason, but it’s a sticking point.

      You shouldn’t need to connect to your smart thermostat by using the company’s servers as an intermediary. That makes the whole thing slower, less reliable, and a point for the company to sell your personal data (that last one being the ultimate reason why it’s done this way).

    • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Everyone having a static IP is a privacy nightmare.

      There’s a reason the recommendation in the standard for ipv6 had to be amended (it whatever the mechanic was) so that generated local suffixes aren’t static. Before that, we were essentially globally identifiable because just the second half of your v6 address was static.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        publicly addressable does not mean publicly routable… your router would still not arbitrarily connect untrusted external devices to internal hosts

        NAT has the property of a firewall only as an implementation detail. replacing NAT with an IPv6 firewall in the router is an upgrade in every conceivable way