• SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I agree. While the main article is goes deep into obscure (albeit interesting) machinations, your article is very on point. It starts with

      if you’re expecting a sexy story about Elon Musk messing with vote-counting software from outer space, sorry, you won’t get that here.

      And then lays down the numbers:

      — 4,776,706 voters were wrongly purged from voter rolls according to US Elections Assistance Commission data.

      — By August of 2024, for the first time since 1946, self-proclaimed “vigilante” voter-fraud hunters challenged the rights of 317,886 voters. The NAACP of Georgia estimates that by Election Day, the challenges exceeded 200,000 in Georgia alone.

      — No fewer than 2,121,000 mail-in ballots were disqualified for minor clerical errors (e.g. postage due).

      — At least 585,000 ballots cast in-precinct were also disqualified.

      — 1,216,000 “provisional” ballots were rejected, not counted.

      — 3.24 million new registrations were rejected or not entered on the rolls in time to vote.

      It continues listing concrete things people can directly influence. I liked the article, thank you soo much. Very insightful.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The numbers feel too coincidental and so a theory like space-based voting machine fraud doesn’t seem as outlandish as it should. At the same time, it attributes to these people a level of finesse and planning that I just don’t see from them.

      The brute force “suppress votes and lie constantly” is much more Trump’s style. It’s basically his whole brand.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      That argument is straightforward and clear and should be spread more widely than it is.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah, I don’t see what they’re hoping to accomplish with this. The pool has been poisoned for years by baseless claims from the far right about election rigging. No amount of evidence is going to change those peoples’ minds, and for the others, you’re preaching to the choir.

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          E-voting across the US has been a continuous attack vector of covert election fraud for over 2 decades, and in all that time nothing was done to harden them to any legitimate degree.

          The oligarchy wanted Trump, and they’ve been subverting democracy longer than all of us have been alive. The SC was already used to steal the presidential election for Bush ffs.

  • crumbguzzler5000@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    The article makes a great point that there are just too many coincidences in all of this, the theories behind the tech also seem quite sound.

    The flipping of swing states on election day but not flipping enough to trigger a recount, so suspicious how a criminal president could be so popular. Especially when many people knew what was at stake, project 2025 had been vocalized a lot.

    • TachyonTele@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I think a big part of the whole picture could also be why in gods name did the Democrats concede before the day even ended?

      • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        My mind went right to the DNC leaders being complicit. Maybe they were shown a window or pictures of their children or they are just shitty people.

        • TachyonTele@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Yeah i don’t know. But they sure went back to thier mansions real quick and stayed out of the picture.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    How is this relevant? Not only you have a king now, but he wasn’t elected by popular vote anyways, he was elected by the electoral college, who aren’t bound to follow the popular vote.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The relevance is that when he is overthrown, the history books will have more justifications as to why

    • Chakravanti@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      No. He wasn’t. Computer cracker rewrote the software that the computers followed with blatant lies.

      Event that shit that you think counts otherwise, is not in any relevancy upon any “if” to any result that was a product of a completely fucking obvious fraud.

      You either know you’re a CIA asset, or you think you got some gorram nonsense lack of logic denial of what is not difficult to see if you stop picking up other people’s literal shit, wiping it on your face with open eyes, and think that that thing that you keep mentioning is anything other than a trick you chose to accept in exchange for what they told you life was and you didn’t ask any real questions or even bother to decode the not-paper or read any of the books explaining everything about what that means.

      They erased the gold relevancy and waited another full gen before people forgot how real life worked before they accepted the sigil and let go what life is.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Y’all say these things sometimes that make one think you just wander around in a nihilistic haze of submission and defeatism.

  • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    These kind of conspiracy theories downplay how much of a piece of shit Nation we have become and how selfish the populace voted.

    • Chakravanti@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      These aren’t theories. Trump said, in his inauguration speech at 53min in, that a non-citizen did that just for him and “rigged the election.” He says that he would KNOT have won but that he get the role anyways.

      Of course his first task is to clip the buyout on the last check of court in his last time in place. Since then, butchering anything and everything in the “governing” and started the Auction to hand out all parts we built and ruled to…Billionaires? He is pending every USD to show how worthless it is now that it has no real guarentee left since they shot the one guy trying to validate it with Gold the way we used to.

      That was Russia? Totally not the CIA.

      Doesn’t matter now. Everyone is tricked to think the “example” (defenition via the first public “anon” written description) is the real deal despite showing everything, what it does, where, from, to, amount, etc. into a log that will never end.

      It is the Snitchcoin. Force corporations to use it so that we can tax the collection of thieves pretending to be human.

      Don’t take my obvious source be accepted as the REAL trustable means. Do your research. Understand how the open source works. Then you don’t need my word. You will understand why Monero was kicked out of nearly every gamble box of loss used to carry pretendables like Zcash, etc.

      Meh…do whatever. I ain’t telling you what to do like they ate during this pig bank gluttony.

  • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Not only did she win, but Trump was never real; he was a figment of everyone’s imagination and was never even running.

    They pulled the wool over our eyes while we were looking the whole time

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    There were a few offhand things Trump said before the election that sure sounded like he was letting slip that the election was rigged - but at the time I chalked them up to his usual overconfident bullshit. Some guy made a video a few months ago highlighting some of the statistical anomalies shown in the article. I thought he made a very persuasive case for vote manipulation but lacked technical evidence. Now that’s coming out as well. I sure hope this plays out like it should. All it takes is one senator to formally challenge the legitimacy of the election and start an investigation.

  • urno@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Momentum is building on this one.

    Either people looking into this are going to be “discouraged” or more evidence will be examined and a consensus will arrive.

    Not saying which way. IMO the rhetoric of Trump prior to the election was basically a confession and I’ve no doubt the election was interfered with. Without any evidence, that is :|

  • TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    [Elon] launched his bid for Twitter […] just 49 days after Putin invaded Ukraine. That alone should have raised every red flag. [emphasis theirs]

    Why?

  • deaf_fish@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    It was weak and impotent when the Republicans did it. So I guess the Democrats feel left out.

      • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        One of the great things of federation is that those instances get blocked by these great people called mods and admins. Substack doesn’t do that.

    • tisktisk@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      Here’s to hoping this comments’ downvotes get an explanation or I’m assuming they’re just coming from nazis without a dignified retort \_ (ツ)_/¯

      • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Logic dictates it’s a dumb thing to post, nazis likely use every site in existence, good luck never using a service that they also use.

        Just because a shitty group of people use a product, doesn’t necessarily mean the product itself is the problem, additionally in this case it’s specifically being used for a good purpose.

        Imagine if you will, a product the can cure horses of parasitic worms, but idiots use it to try and cure themselves of a disease we have an actual cure for, and someone comes along and says hey I used this stuff to cure my horse and this guy comes in and says, “Well actually, people used that product improperly so actually it’s bad.”

        People boo them, and you say, “man all these people sure love taking this product improperly”

        • StarlightDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          Omg are you trapped in 2015? Starting a reply with “logic dictates” is so gamergate coded. Learn some basic philosophy before saying stuff like that because it demonstrates you have no idea what objectivity or subjectivity are.

        • tisktisk@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          I hope your ‘logic’ also dictates a difference between using a product and (condoning) publishing/monetizing pro-nazi content. Hopefully most can see how one is a potential issue at the least. I know we all gotta eat tho–and to that end I don’t wish to throw shade unnecessarily.

            • tisktisk@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Ah yes great point getting to the core of my post by using false analogies, red herrings and appeals to ridicule

              Your logic dictates strange paths to truth friend.

              • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I’m specifically pointing out that’s the logic being applied by the original response, which I made more clear with my example

                • tisktisk@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I understand what you think you’re pointing out (I was also hoping you were familiar with the fallacies I listed so you could maybe refine your position).

                  I still believe platforms like Substack have a responsibility to try to avoid enabling harmful (such as nazi) ideologies. Do you think you could spell out a logic for why I shouldn’t hold this belief? Preferably without unrelated analogies that distract from a simple coherent argument if possible