• 0xD@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            That’s the default setting when setting up a local wallet. It is also more private due to not being dependent on someone else’s node.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            46
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            How else are you going to bring up Monero in unrelated discussions about computer hardware?

              • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 days ago

                When running a local node, the most other people could possibly see is that “x IP is running a Monero node”

                When connecting to a remote node, the node can see:

                • Your IP address
                • When you submit a transaction (which could link your IP to your transactions)
                • The last block your wallet synced (which could be used to determine when you usually use/spent monero last)

                It’s also possible for a remote node to feed your wallet a manipulated list of decoys, which can reduce the anonymity of the transaction you submit by allowing the remote node to simply remove the fake decoys to find which isn’t the decoy (you.)

              • theseer@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 days ago

                Because with someone else’s node, they can potentially track and log the transactions you make

        • oppy1984@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          This is how I know I’m getting old, my first thought was “spinning rust for always on long term storage” and then I remembered it’s 2025 and SSD’s are about equal now.

          Get off my lawn, your interrupting Matlock!

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Still cheaper though. 4TB you are looking at around 3x the price for it in SSD storage. Although I wonder how the power use compares, might be worth factoring in but probably isn’t too massive over it’s realistic lifespan

            • oppy1984@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Oh yeah, I run spinning rust in my nas. All data storage for me is on HDDs, only OS date is on the SSD. That’s for the nas and my computer.

              • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                My main data usage is game installs and pretty unimportant temporary stuff so it doesn’t need backup fortunately. Game saves do of course but a simple bash script and the file size for that is tiny in comparison.

                SSD performance would be nice to have, but costs extra.

                • oppy1984@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  SSDs are getting reasonable, you might want to look into it again if that’s your use case.