irelephant 🍭@lemm.ee to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agolooks good to melemm.eeimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up12arrow-down1imagelooks good to melemm.eeirelephant 🍭@lemm.ee to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square16fedilinkcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoSo catching errors and doing nothing? That exists in every language except maybe BASIC?
minus-squareSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-25 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoCatching individual errors is fine. Having all errors be ignored by default is weird.
minus-squarelocuester@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoVery different. This means default ignore all errors and continue to the next line. You’d have to explicitly catch every line in most(all?) other languages.
So catching errors and doing nothing? That exists in every language except maybe BASIC?
deleted by creator
Catching individual errors is fine. Having all errors be ignored by default is weird.
Very different. This means default ignore all errors and continue to the next line. You’d have to explicitly catch every line in most(all?) other languages.