einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 30 days agoultimate storage hacksh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square91linkfedilinkarrow-up1902arrow-down125
arrow-up1877arrow-down1external-linkultimate storage hacksh.itjust.workseinfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 30 days agomessage-square91linkfedilink
minus-squareBrahvim Bhaktvatsal@lemmy.kde.sociallinkfedilinkisiZuluarrow-up1·edit-229 days ago…Just asking, just asking: Why is the default FILENAME_MAX on Linux/glibc 4096?
minus-squarebarsoap@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·28 days agoBecause PATH_MAX is? Also because it’s a 4k page. FILENAME_MAX is not safe to use for buffer allocations btw it could be INT_MAX.
minus-squareBrahvim Bhaktvatsal@lemmy.kde.sociallinkfedilinkisiZuluarrow-up1·27 days agoThanks! Got an answer and not 200 downvotes. This is why I love Lemm-Lemm.
…Just asking, just asking: Why is the default
FILENAME_MAX
on Linux/glibc4096
?Because PATH_MAX is? Also because it’s a 4k page.
FILENAME_MAX is not safe to use for buffer allocations btw it could be INT_MAX.
Thanks! Got an answer and not 200 downvotes. This is why I love Lemm-Lemm.